Return To the Celestial Review (This does NOT open a new window)
Return To the Index (This does NOT open a new window)


Note, to make reading multi-part stories easier, story links (links with dejanews.com or www.qz.to, NOT the review or profile links) will open up a new browser window. When you are done reading the story, or section of the story simply CLOSE the story window.


"Andrew and Tina" by Dream Spinner (Brotherly Love) Sven: 8, 9, 8
http://www.qz.to/erotica/assm/Year98/12695.txt


"Andrew and Tina" by Dream Spinner (authorsix@hotmail.com). Review by Sven the
Elder, who may be contacted at Sven@brass-neck.demon.co.uk.

(Bi, incest, masturbation, t/t) so say's the author, he also tells us at the
end that: and I quote: "J.O. Dickingson - Author's note: This is a true event
that occurred in May, 1998, as related to me by Andrew and posted with his
permission."

The story relates to an event where the young people concerned are involved in
a 'walk-in masturbatory 'incident'. I tend to follow the precept that
Bronwen mentioned recently in an assd discussion. Both of the participants
are clearly 'under age', but this is not a pedo story, rather an incident
between siblings who are growing up and finding their sexuality. I suspect it
happens more than people realise. Regrettably nothing of this nature ever
happened to me.

Now to the actual writing. I have to say that I found this a rather
unsatisfying re-telling of what, for the co-conspirators, appears to have been
very satisfying. For my tastes the descriptions, using the Celestial 'List of
Credulous Assumptions' as a guide, spoilt things. There are more satisfying
descriptions that a writer can use that are also more pleasing for the reader
to read. One of the secrets of writing erotica is to leave room in the
readerss heads to conjure up images to suit their own imaginations. How many
times have you read a superb book, then gone to see a subsequent film 'based'
on the same story, that fails to measure up. Principally because your
personal imagery conjured up is not the same as the film Directors.

As a reader you peruse a passage, conjure an image in your mind - too much of
a certain style of detail in the written work holds this process back.

Sorry Jay - this just missed for me.

Ratings for "Andrew and Tina"
Athena (technical quality): 8 - a good solid average story - nothing
outstanding
Venus (plot & character): 9 - better than average development.
Sven (appeal to reviewer): 8 - a little too clinical and stilted for
my tastes.