Return To the Celestial Review (This does NOT open a new window)
Return To the Index (This does NOT open a new window)


Note, to make reading multi-part stories easier, story links (links with dejanews.com or www.qz.to, NOT the review or profile links) will open up a new browser window. When you are done reading the story, or section of the story simply CLOSE the story window.


* "Cocktail Table" by Sue (orgy) 10, 10, 10
http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=206953281
http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=206874490 ------------------- CR#88 - May 29, 1996 -------------------


*"Cocktail Table" by Sue. Sue accepts an invitation to a party
from some graduate students who admire her literary work. After
the initial fuss over her arrival, everyone sits around in a quiet
circle with their hands on their laps while Sue reads "Slippery
When Wet" to the group. Everyone gets turned on by the splendid
reading, and the spokesman for the group suggests that Sue may
want to leave before the ensuing orgy begins. Sue chooses to
stay. Actually, Sue tells it better; so read the story.

I shall now respond to the one unanswered question in Sue's story:
the plural of "clitoris" is "clitorises". Interestingly enough,
my spellcheck recognized this plural, even though it failed to
recognize "anally," "Sistine," "dominatrix," and "supermodel." I
verified this plural in my unabridged dictionary, where the word
is found right after "cliticize" (the meaning of which may
surprise you) and on the same page with a picture of a cloister.
Talk about a screwed up value system! The dictionary defines
clit, clitoris, and cliticize (and 101 pages later gives three
definitions for cunt, which happen to come right before Mario
Cuomo - now there's a coincidence for you), but it gives a picture
of a cloister instead of a clitoris! I mean, how many readers in
all of history have looked at the definition of a cloister and
said, "Damn! I wish I had a picture to clear this up for me!"
Sorry about the digression; but Sue did raise the original
question in her story.

{Well, now that I have already digressed, I might mention that I
did a double-take during proofreading - 101 pages of definitions
between clitoris and Cuomo? Yes, that's right. Yesterday a
prissy student came up to my desk and told me that another student
- who was disgruntled over her grade - had called me "the c-word."
I asked her to be more specific, but she couldn't utter "the c-
word" out loud. She doesn't realize how truly ambiguous her
accusation was!}

This was a very enjoyable story. I have only one problem with it,
and that problem is akin to the play within a play theme that
often occurs in Shakespeare. When Sue has six guys shoot their
jism all over her body (never mind the cunt juices that are
flowing like milk and honey) - when she gets her pastry frosted by
six guys at once, whose record is she breaking? (Not mine,
certainly!) She compares it to the four guys whose snorkels she
cleared in "Slippery When Wet," but that's a work of fiction, and
is recognized as such even in the present work of fiction. Sue
herself is actually a most demure person who probably isn't even
named Sue and almost certainly has not participated in Onan's
Olympics with more than two male partners at the same time. So
what we have here is a fiction within a fiction and how do we know
that even that is not fiction? In other words, that that is not
is not that that is. (I was tempted to replace "in other words"
with "that is" in the preceding sentence, but then the thought
would have become confusing.)

Sorry. Even though I am a most cunning linguist I just never had
a chance to say that last sentence in a meaningful context before.
If you're ever in danger of premature orgasm, try repeating and
understanding that sentence, and it will probably keep you from
coming at least until your partner catches up with you.

Ratings for "Cocktail Table"
Athena (technical quality): 10
Venus (plot & character): 10
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 10