Return To the Celestial Review (This does NOT open a new window)
Return To the Index (This does NOT open a new window)


Note, to make reading multi-part stories easier, story links (links with dejanews.com or www.qz.to, NOT the review or profile links) will open up a new browser window. When you are done reading the story, or section of the story simply CLOSE the story window.


"Glenda" by The Bear (shifting values) 9, 8, 7
http://search1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=352291504 (1)


"Glenda" by The Bear (al-bear@ix.netcom.com). Guest review by BillyG
(hayden@mindless.com)
http://search1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=352291504 (1)

The re-poster of this story attributes it to The Bear. I understand
there are two authors with that name. This Bear characterizes "Glenda"
as follows: "This one is unusual for the BEAR in that both participants
are adults, so there is not any youthful sex in this one."

"Glenda" is a 1995 story that is studded with reality, or perhaps more
correctly, the quandaries of real life. In a fantasy world of
absolutes, there might be a "right way" to live life, a set of rules
that, if followed, would assure one of being proper. But that's not how
life works. "Glenda" underscores the fact that we live in a grey world
of shifting values.

What are some of these standards? How about the age differential
between men and women? Or more specifically, between an older man and a
younger woman?

Picture this: The protagonist, John, a caring and decent guy, once dated
Glenda's mom. For the sake of discussion, let's assume Glenda's mom
gave birth to her when she was twenty. If, as he recalls, she was a
"pretty little girl" before she became an even more attractive teenager,
we estimate his and her mom's age at about 30 when Glenda was say ten.
Twenty years difference on that end is huge. But John meets Glenda
again when she's in her "late twenties' - let's put it at 30 for
purposes of round numbers. So, John's now about twenty years older, or
about fifty.

How's that feel? A lot less inappropriate certainly than when she was a
lot younger, huh? Perhaps. Depends on your views, I guess.

The story alludes to another mismatch - size. Glenda's 4' 9" while John
is considerably larger. We're not sure about the magnitude of the
physical discrepancy, but he's able to hold her on his lap with ease.

To be truthful, neither of these issues loom as substantive in this
romance, especially the size differential. In fact it would appear to
work for their benefit for, "She isn't quite sure why, but she has found
that she prefers men who are both quite a bit older than she is, and
that are very large and strong, although the body-builder types don't
tickle her fancy at all." I suppose it's not for nothing that the
author calls himself The Bear.

So, this story unfolds as a very sweet tale of a younger woman and an
older man who have secretly been attracted to each other for years and
now, by serendipity, have the opportunity to explore the heretofore off-
limits areas. Glenda becomes John's houseguest and through necessity,
they must sleep in separate beds in the same room. Given this
background, the remainder of the story evolves as you would predict.

It's a tension-free story of early unrequited love that enjoys a sweet
redemption when they re-discover each other as adults. There's no high
drama or convoluted seduction in this story. It's a straight ahead,
simple love story. Very sweet but not too high on the peter meter.

Ratings for "Glenda"
Athena (technical quality): 9
Venus (plot & character): 8
BillyG (appeal to reviewer): 7 (Sweet, but not hot)
Review of "The Fish" by S. B. Douglass (). Guest review by Dave Myers.
http://search1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=189330352
http://search1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=189330234

For regular readers of erotica who don't usually find sci-fi stories
appealing, this is a very good starting point for sampling the genre. I
won't spoil the twist of the story (for those who haven't guessed it
from the title), but it's quite creative. Typical of sci-fi stories, the
sex is downplayed by the wild idea spun out in the text.

A few spelling errors blemish an otherwise very nicely written piece.
The scientific terms seem to have given the most trouble: "simbiotic"
for "symbiotic", sometimes "urchin" and sometimes "urchen". I could also
quibble over whether or not there are any true atolls in the Florida
Keys, but these mistakes don't degrade the overall story. Try it, you'll
like it.

Rating: 8.5