Return To the Celestial Review (This does NOT open a new window)
Return To the Index (This does NOT open a new window)


Note, to make reading multi-part stories easier, story links (links with dejanews.com or www.qz.to, NOT the review or profile links) will open up a new browser window. When you are done reading the story, or section of the story simply CLOSE the story window.


"Getting Even With Mary Anne" by Thomas M. Quin (revenge rape) 10, 9, 9
http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=340694101
http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=340694107


"Getting Even With Mary Anne" by Thomas M. Quin (tmquin@ibm.net). Guest
review by Sandman (sandman@bitsmart.com).

I just came off reviewing "Pizza Guy", an ugly little scene where a woman is
brutalized and humiliated ­ basically the kind of story where I walk away
depressed that there are people out there who fantasize about this kind of
stuff. Then Celeste sends me "Getting Even with Mary Anne," which is
basically a story where a man brutalizes a woman, rapes her, and gives it the
old college try at humiliating her.

What's the difference between the two? Well "Pizza Guy" was a scene and
"Getting Even with Mary Anne" was a story. The difference is as stark as
these two examples:

1] There are two men in the room. One man draws a gun and shoots the other
dead.

2] There are two men in the room. One man draws a gun and murders the man who
raped, tortured, and killed his wife.

Makes a difference doesn't it? You see in this story a man has been falsely
accused of rape, he's eventually vindicated but anyone can understand why he'd
harbor less than kind feelings towards his accuser. Then he accidentally
bumps into her -- well he'd already done the time, might as well do the crime.
Or something like that. So he ends up raping her, though I have to say it's
probably the weirdest damn rape scene I've ever read.

I didn't exactly agree with why the "hero" was doing what he was doing, but
then unlike "Pizza Guy" and "All night long" I didn't feel like I was about to
loose my lunch either. The story itself is very well written, set in a very
interesting small town with interesting small town politics (Steven King would
be proud). The "hero" is compelling, complex, and sympathetic.

At the risk of rambling I'd like to point out that this story is in two parts,
a separate prolog followed by the story itself. When I initially read the
story I missed the prolog. The effect actually made the story more appealing
to me as it added an element of mystery about what was happening that layer by
layer began to unfold. By the end of the story I had figured out everything
but the actual crime the "hero" had been accused of . When I compiled the
links I found the prolog and read it, but really I'm not terribly sure I would
have liked this story as much if I had read the prolog first.

I was a bit confused at the ending as I asked myself exactly what had been
achieved, what had been the point? In the end I'm not terribly sure that the
empty feeling wasn't the point. Revenge, after all, doesn't REALLY change
anything (or as the Star Trek's Khan said: "Revenge is a dish best served
cold"). I did have to think on it a bit before I arrived at that conclusion.

I guess if you do enough of these review thingies you're eventually going to
find a "squick" story that holds an appeal to you. I'll admit this story
held an appeal. Nick, perpetually on the lookout for a N/C story he'd like,
should probably take a look at this one. Though I doubt anyone would treat
this as one-handed fiction (not even N/C fans) or even consider it a timeless
classic, it is still a fascinating story and Quin did a remarkable, even
admirable job of presenting a potentially VERY upsetting story without pushing
the "squick" button hard enough for me to distance myself from the story.

Ratings for " Getting Even With Mary Anne "
Athena (technical quality): 10
Venus (plot & character): 9
Sandman (appeal to reviewer): 9