Celestial Reviews 99 - July 13, 1996

Note:  More good news!  We have arranged to repost the Trinity Trilogy 
stories.  I’ll review three stories (a trilogy) every week, and the 
stories should appear in the postings at about the same time.  The best 
thing I can say about these stories is that they remind me of the work 
of Mark Aster, who constantly receives high praise in my reviews.  The 
Trilogy stories are creatively written.  While they almost invariably 
involve hot sex, they also develop the personalities of the characters. 
You may want to keep your eyes open for these stories.

Second Note:  A reader named Axel who described himself as a pedantic 
European taking a shower asked, “How come this highly educated person 
{c’est moi} is throwing a Roman goddess (Venus) together with a Greek 
goddess (Athena)? Wouldn't *Aphrodite* be a more appropriate companion 
for Athena” in the rating system?  {Interesting Freudian note:  Do you 
know what my spellcheck thinks I’m trying to spell when I type 
*Aphrodite* with the asterisks (wildcards) before and after? 
Hermaphrodite.  Makes sense, doesn’t it?}

Axel is quite right to note that there is an inconsistency in the 
nationality of the goddesses whose names are used in my system. 
However, please note that Celeste is neither a Greek nor a Roman 
goddess - just a name that sounds nice.

I might ask why Axel suggests that it is Venus whose name is incorrect.  
In fact, I originally intended to choose two Roman goddesses, but I 
liked the name Athena better than Minerva.  Can you imagine someone 
being concerned about his/her Minerva rating?  What were the Romans 
thinking?

However, I have to congratulate Axel.  I have been posting for a year 
now, and he’s the first person to call this to my attention.  It's nice 
to know that there are educated readers out there, even if they are 
taking showers in Europe.

Third Note:  People are constantly asking me where to find the stories 
I review.  I do not have time to reply to these requests individually.  
The answer is that all the stories are in the alt.sex.stories postings.  
If you can find me reviews, chances are good that you can also find the 
stories.  If they’re not in your postings, then something is wrong with 
your service.  I supply additional advice in my FAQ, which I post 
occasionally.

- Celeste

      “A Lovely Girl” by Michael K. Smith (rape) 10, 10, 10
      “When Morning Comes” by Joe Parsons (dream lover)
            10, 9.5, 9.5
      “Trinity Trilogy Novel 1/14” by Tom Trinity 
            (relationships) 10, 10, 10
      “Bobbi Sue's Adventure 1” by Bobbi Sue (sex on the run)
            10, 10, 10
      “Young Love and a Forty-Five” by Jared M. (adolescent
            sex) 6, 5, 5
      “Baby Sitting” by The Englishman (incest) 10, 10, 10
      “Mary Tyler Moore” by Uncle Mike (sitcom parody) 
            10, 9. 9
      “The Waltons” by Uncle Mike (sitcom parody)
            10, 9, 7
      “The Party” by WouldBeBad (orgy) 9, 10, 7.
      "Brief Visitor" by Sunrain (sci fi) 7, 6, 6
      “Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire” by SueNH (revenge) 10, 9, 9

"A Lovely Girl” by Michael K. Smith (mksmith@taproot.win.net).  This is 
a vivid story about a homicidal maniac who rapes a thirteen-year-old 
girl.  The horror continues to build throughout the story until it 
reaches its full impact at the very end.  What I truly appreciated 
about this story is that the author did not pretend that the little 
girl enjoyed any part of the experience.

Rating the story was difficult.  Its use of language was excellent; no 
problem there - 10.  The plot was exceptionally well developed; again, 
no problem - another 10.  But did I like it?  Actually, I was repulsed 
by it.  I definitely did not get turned on; and I hated the 
protagonist.  My fervent hope is that nothing like the events depicted 
in this story should ever happen to anyone I love.  So I didn’t like 
it; but I did ADMIRE it.  It conveyed to me an accurate description of 
the mind of a pervert; and I think I’m a better person because of the 
experience.  And so, for appeal to reviewer - another 10.

Ratings for “A Lovely Girl”
Athena (technical quality): 10
Venus (plot & character): 10
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 10

“When Morning Comes” by Joe Parsons (jmp@cyber-mall.com).  Ellen has a 
kind and gentle lover who does everything he can to meet her needs; but 
she longs for someone who will dominate her.  She wakens from a dream 
and finds a stranger in her bedroom, who does to her all that she had 
dreamed of and more.  Was it a dream or reality?  You read it and 
decide for yourself.

Ratings for “When Morning Comes”
Athena (technical quality): 10
Venus (plot & character): 9.5
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 9.5

“The Trinity Trilogy Novel 1/14” by  Tom Trinity (shelbyb@iglou.com).  
This is the first of fourteen segments of Trinity Trilogy Series.  The 
author wishes to remain anonymous and private; the address is that of 
the editor, Shelby Bush, who has posted the stories in the past and who 
remains in contact with the author; and so mail sent to that address 
will reach the author.  Shelby will wait until I post a review and then 
immediately post another one of the fourteen segments.  It is my 
understanding that all 99 stories are also archived at the Backdrop, 
and I’ll try to give you more particulars in a subsequent issue of CR.

The stories remind me of Mark Aster’s “My Friends the Allens” series.  
Both sets of stories are extremely well written.  In addition both are 
much like a weekly TV sitcom to the extent that each episode stands 
alone, but there is an element of continuity that runs through the 
entire series.  I suppose we could call them sitcums.  They differ from 
what I’ll call serialized stories, which try to focus on a single plot 
across several chapters contained in successive postings. Finally, both 
sets of stories are clever and well-rounded.  By that I mean that the 
stories are about people with realistic personalities and contain 
insights and events that go beyond direct genital contact.

In the first story we learn that Tom, Judy, and Candy are three people 
who enjoy going to science fiction conventions together.  They have 
been together often without expressing sexual interest in one another - 
although the ladies seem to have trouble talking about topics other 
than sex.  Returning to Tom’s apartment one night, they watch the movie 
“Deep Throat” together, and Judy and Tom gather later that night for 
some really pleasant sex.  The seed has been planted for many happy 
episodes.

In “The Devil in Miss Candy” Tom, Judy, and Candy gather at Tom’s 
apartment to watch “The Devil and Miss Jones.”  This is an interesting 
coincidence, because the first two porn movies I myself ever saw were 
the two this trio shared: “Deep Throat” and “The Devil and Miss Jones.”  
I recall asking my husband the same question that one of the girls 
asked about “Deep Throat”: “If her clit’s in her throat, how come she 
keeps rubbing her pussy?”  I suppose maybe the coincidence in choice of 
movies isn’t all that remarkable; maybe there weren’t many porn movies 
fifteen or so years ago.  We saw the movies as a double feature when my 
husband was accompanying me to a convention in New York.  {Teachers can 
only engage in public depravity when we’re someplace where our students 
or their parents are not likely to see us.}  What I remember most about 
that evening is my husband returning to his seat and telling me that he 
would never again go to the bathroom in a porn theater. It seems that 
dirty old men are really preoccupied with their dirty old things in 
those establishments.  My husband’s decision was fine with me, because 
I had become more than a little anxious in his absence.  I recalled 
being told in a health class that one cannot catch venereal diseases 
except by direct contact.  After that visit I believed what that 
teacher had said; if it were possible to catch VD by breathing the air, 
I would have developed several varieties from that trip to the theater.  
Were it not for the rise of the video rental store, I might never have 
seen another porn flick.

Anyway, after our three friends watch “Miss Jones,” Candy announces 
that it is about time she loses her virginity, and Tom has been elected 
to do the honors.  Judy serves as a sort of choreographer or mistress 
of ceremonies, making sure that Candy gets her money’s worth from this 
first experience.  It’s a very erotic sequence.  

The relationship among the three friends develops rapidly. Pretty soon 
Tom has to guess each evening which of the two girls would come by the 
apartment to spend the night; there did not seem to be a pattern, and 
it was often a tossup.  The descriptions of sexual activity are 
consistently hot.  I don’t know how an author can keep this up for 13 
more segments.

In addition to the other nice things I’ve said about this series, I 
should mention one more strength: the people are normal - they are 
ordinary people doing extraordinary things.  In this story, for 
example, we learn that Candy is overweight but sexy.  Imagine that.  
Which reminds me...

Three women died and went to the Pearly Gates, where St. Peter 
interviewed them.  He asked the first woman for her name.  She replied 
that it was Penny. St. Peter checked his list, found her name, and 
said, “It is proper that you have that name.  You were greedy and 
avaricious during your life.  You are condemned to hell.  Be gone, evil 
woman.”  He asked the next woman her name, and she replied that it was 
Sherry.  He checked the book and said, “Tis well that you are named 
Sherry, for wine and liquor were your undoing.  Go to eternal 
damnation, you lousy drunk.”  He turned to the third woman, who was 
already walking away.  “Where do you think you’re going?” asked St. 
Peter.  “I can take a hint,” she replied.  “My name is Fanny.” {End of 
digression.  Back to The Trinity Trilogy.}

As much as I have begun to enjoy this set of stories, I have no 
interest in living my personal life the way the Trinity characters do.  
I have a personal religious and philosophical orientation that leads me 
to expect that sexual fulfillment is more likely to occur in the 
context of a dedicated, monogamous relationship than in the relatively 
hedonistic, open relationship described in this story.  I say this not 
as part of a moral lecture.  I may be entirely wrong; but so far my 
approach is working pretty well for me and my husband.  I think stories 
like this describe an idealized hedonistic relationship and ignore the 
problems (e.g., jealousy, insecurity, rivalries, incomplete 
commitments, etc.) that are likely to disrupt non-monogamous 
relationships.  I’m not trying to talk anyone out of their happy 
pluralistic relationships; and I am also aware that I probably idealize 
my own relationship with my husband.  My point is that even as a person 
with an entirely different perspective on ideal sexual relationships, I 
find this kind of story to be refreshing and enjoyable.  Not only can I 
enjoy a good story, but I can also expand my horizons by understanding 
a different viewpoint a little better.

Having said what I said in the previous paragraph, let me now say the 
opposite.  I watch “Days of Our Lives.”  I record it each day while I’m 
teaching and watch it every night before I go to bed - unless something 
disrupts my orderly life.  I discuss DOOL each day with some of my 
friends in the teachers’ lounge.  This may sound complicated, but Bo 
had been in love with Hope, who died.  Then Bo fell in love with 
Billie.  But Hope hadn’t died after all.  So Bo had to decide between 
Billie and Hope.  {Actually, it’s even more complicated, because Hope 
lost her memory and got kidnapped by Jude Sinclair, and Billie really 
liked Hope.} Bo chose Hope, because she was the mother of his child; 
and so Billie got dumped, but I hear she’s coming back.  I shocked all 
my colleagues one day when I simply stated, “What’s the problem? He 
should keep them both.”  In the unlikely event that my husband thinks I 
am dead and falls deeply in love with or even marries another woman and 
then I return, I’ll simply slip him a copy of the Trinity Trilogy and 
tell him, “It’s OK.  Keep us both. I can learn to like her.”

The term Trilogy refers to the fact that the stories were originally 
posted in twelve sets of three.  Shelby is reposting them in fourteen 
segments, the first one containing six stories.  I cannot possibly 
review each individual story and still have time do justice to the many 
other stories I’d like to review.  So what I intend to do is read and 
enjoy each segment and then write about some of the major ideas in each 
of my reviews.  I hope you enjoy both my reviews and these excellent 
stories.

Ratings for “Trinity Trilogy Novel 1/14”
Athena (technical quality): 10
Venus (plot & character): 10
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 10

“Bobbi Sue's Adventure 1” by Bobbi Sue (nobody@REPLAY.COM).  This is an 
autobiographical account of what happened to a 30-year old woman when 
she discovered this newsgroup.  Actually, her husband introduced this 
newsgroup to her as an example of how perverted some areas of the 
Internet were.  He’s only 26, sexually effective, a bit of a prude, and 
knows nothing about Bobbi Sue’s new adventures.

Bobbi Sue slipped gradually into depravity.  First she read the stories 
and jumped her husband when he got home; then she began to masturbate 
after reading the stories; and soon she found herself selecting carrots 
and cucumbers at the market based on how she thought they would fill 
her pussy.  Such are the trials of the everyday housewife who gave up 
the good life for Tom.  

Alas, one day Bobbi decides to go nearly au naturel during her noontime 
run. She can feel the breeze on her exposed ass, and the brief that she 
had pulled up between her cheeks is working its way between her wet 
pussy lips.  {You can get a bad rash if you do this too often.}  
Shortly after she discards her top, she almost collides with a guy on a 
mountain bike.  She just passes him, but she imagines him watching her 
cute little ass as she trots the half mile to her turnaround point.  
When she turns, he’s gone; but when she rounds the corner, there he is 
jacking himself off with the top she had discarded.  She asks for the 
top back, but he isn't done with it yet. He says that he will give it 
back pretty soon, if she will be kind enough to turn around and let him 
see her ass again.  He asks to fuck her; but she declines.  That would 
be beyond her present limits.  He suggests a blow job; she compromises 
at a hand job, as long as she can fuck herself with the bicycle pump 
while he cums on her face.

Bobbi Sue describes this as within her limits of fidelity. Those are 
pretty broad limits.  I myself define FANTASIZING about this as within 
my own limits of fidelity, and so I guess my husband and I have less 
generous limits.  But it’s a good fantasy, and both Bobbi Sue and I 
fucked our husband’s brains out afterwards.  I’ve noticed several 
additional Bobbi Sue Adventures in the postings, and I’ll try to review 
some of the later episodes when I get a chance.

Ratings for “Bobbi Sue's Adventure 1”
Athena (technical quality): 10
Venus (plot & character): 10
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 10

“Young Love and a Forty-Five” by Jared M. (lovetodang@aol.com).  The 
narrator is a 17-year-old who has moved from Chicago to California and 
apparently intends to do something there other than study rocket 
science.  He finds a nice girl who will let him kiss her. Cool!  Since 
he’s in the prime of his sexual life, he’s really happy when she asks 
if he’d like to try something else and he asks what and she says, "I 
don't know.  Whatever you'd like."  Really cool!   Then Jessica asks 
him to take off her pants.  Way cool!  They fuck kind of in slow 
motion, and the look on her face is “one of confusion and intense 
arousement.”  Too cool to talk about!  “After the spams ended, they 
just layed there, giggling and kissing, shocked at what they had just 
done.”  Unbelievably cool!

Either the author IS an unsophisticated 19-year-old male writing about 
his early sexual with a 15-year-old girlfriend or he is trying to write 
like one.  If this really is a literally true story about the first 
sexual experiences of a young couple, then I suppose I should apologize 
for the irreverence I may have expressed in the preceding paragraph.  
One doesn’t have to be a literary giant to be a tender lover.  The 
problem is that the author is writing for an audience, and the story 
comes across as sounding really simple-minded.  

I remember watching a “Family Ties” episode several years ago in which 
the writer wanted to make Mallory seem to be putting on false airs of 
pseudo-intelligence.  She used words like “importosity” and 
“smartitude.”  There are no such words; the humor arises from the fact 
that there are very simple words that mean what Mallory really wanted 
to say (“importance” and “intelligence”).  Similarly, there is no such 
word as “arousement”; the author meant “arousal,” and he should have 
been able to figure this out before going to press with this story.  
That’s why proofreading is important.  Likewise, it was probably the 
“spasms” that ended - although on the Internet we normally appreciate 
it when the spams end; and there is no such word as “layed”; it should 
be “lay.”  And I have no clue regarding what the title means; what does 
a “forty-five” have to do with the story?  My guesses range from breast 
size (of a 15-year-old?) to a weapon.  Maybe I missed something.

If the author (or reader) wants instruction, it would be useful to 
compare this story with the preceding story (“Bobbi Sue's Adventure”).  
In both cases the author purports to be relating a true series of 
events; and (assuming the incidents really did happen) both stories 
would have been intensely interesting to the original participants.  
But “Bobbi Sue” is clearly more absorbing to an audience that wasn’t 
there to experience the story first-hand.

Ratings for “Young Love and a Forty-Five”
Athena (technical quality): 6
Venus (plot & character): 5
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 5

“Baby Sitting” by The Englishman (ESkilton@aol.com).  The story is a 
clear and plausible description of a trusted relative molesting a young 
girl.  I’m sure this newsgroup is full of people who will find this to 
be erotic.  I didn’t.  When I read a story about a child having sex 
with an adult, I seem to automatically ask myself whether I would have 
enjoyed either (1) having this happen to me as a child, or (2) doing 
this as an adult to a child.  There are some things that I am glad I 
did not do as a child, but which would have been enjoyable.  Examples 
include seducing a couple of my teachers, fucking under the bleachers 
at the football field, and fondling some of my fellow cheerleaders.  
These things would have been enjoyable, but they probably would have 
affected my life in an undesirable way.  However, I really do sometimes 
wish I could have done some of these things - that is, I occasionally 
wish my value system would have been different, so that I would have 
felt free to do those things.  Since my value system is what it is, and 
since that part of my life is over, I settle for reading stories about 
people with different value systems who did do these things.

The situation is different with child molestation.  There is a limited 
sense in which I WOULD have enjoyed being molested as a child by a 
trusted relative.  It’s the same sense that I WOULD have enjoyed eating 
vast quantities of chocolate candy that would have made me puke 
afterwards, stealing money from my parents’ wallets, or pushing fat 
ladies down escalators.  These activities would all have been fun, but 
I’m glad I didn’t do them.  In the same way, I’m certain that it would 
be PLEASURABLE to be seduced and exploited by a trusted adult - after 
all, physiological reactions occur no matter who stimulates them; but 
the harm would outweigh the benefits by so much that it’s hardly true 
to say that I “wish” something like that would have happened to me.

Is this an “evil” story - the sort that lends a bit of validity to the 
arguments of people who say that Internet sex will ruin the lives of 
children?  I don’t think so.  I think any reader with an ounce of sense 
can see that this little girl is being manipulated for the 
gratification of her uncle.  I think the overall realism makes it a 
good story.  I think the “religious” people who object to stories like 
this should have the courage of their convictions and believe that if 
readers see realistic information, the “truth will prevail.”  If I knew 
my children were reading this story, I would simply help them see the 
shallowness of the uncle’s reasoning; and I think they would thereby 
become LESS likely to be exploited themselves.  In fact, this story 
would be worthwhile reading as part of a course in parenting.

If a little girl doesn’t learn about sex from a Benign Opportunist, 
where would she learn about it?  Well, I myself learned to kiss from a 
pimple-faced kid whom I respected and trusted.  I learned to French 
kiss from a really nice guy with whom I split up because his priorities 
in life differed from my own. I gradually learned more and more by 
experimenting with my peers and with my boyfriends in settings of trust 
and respect.  I think most normal people learn this way.  And I think 
the stories on this newsgroup that describe learning about sex in an 
atmosphere of trust and respect are every bit as sexy and interesting 
as those that describe exploitation, as this one does.

Ratings for “Baby Sitting”
Athena (technical quality): 10
Venus (plot & character): 10
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 10

“Mary Tyler Moore” by Uncle Mike (fr582@cleveland.Freenet.Edu).  Mary 
needs some time off, and Mr. Grant is unwilling to give it to her.  
Finally, she whines in her inimitable way that she’ll “do anything for 
it.”  Mr. Grant’s eyes light up in response to an evil thought: “You’ll 
do anything, Mary? ANYthing?”  So Lou finally gets the blow job he’s 
always wanted from Mary; and Mary figures it’s over.  But then Ted 
walks into the office; and to keep him quiet Lou lets him fuck Mary; 
and to placate Mary for this humiliation, Lou gives her a second week 
off.  But then Murray walks into the office, and we have another 
emboikment and another week’s vacation.  And then Gordie the weather 
man walks into the office...  This is a pretty good parody.  Mary, Lou, 
and Ted are done best; it’s easy to imagine these TV characters doing 
what they do in this story. 

Ratings for “Mary Tyler Moore”
Athena (technical quality): 10
Venus (plot & character): 9
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 9

“The Waltons” by Uncle Mike (fr582@cleveland.Freenet.Edu).  Erin and 
Jason, the 12- and 13-year old children of the Walton clan go off to a 
field and watch horses copulate.  They marvel, and Erin tries to get 
Jason to explain the process to her more clearly, but Jason doesn’t 
know much himself.  Eventually they experiment by examining Jason’s 
sexual anatomy and then Erin’s; and after that Erin suggests that Jason 
and she might want to imitate the horses.  They quickly discover the 
missionary position, which they prefer to horsy style; and soon they 
are having sex regularly.  Then one day their older sister Mary Ellen 
catches them in the act.  So Jason fucks her too - after Erin primes 
her, of course.  A prologue tells us that eventually the rest of the 
kids join the fun as well.

This is an interesting story about kids having sex with each other on 
the farm; and I guess it’s fun to associate the activities with the 
various Walton kids.  I have trouble with parodies, however, when the 
people get too far out of character.  These kids all behave as if their 
irresponsible parents have taught them nothing about sex.  I have an 
overwhelming impression that the parents and grandparents in the Walton 
series would have done a better job of raising their kids.

Ratings for “The Waltons”
Athena (technical quality): 10
Venus (plot & character): 9
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 7

“The Party” by WouldBeBad (WouldBeBad@aol.com).  I occasionally give 
negative reviews to stories because they are “filled with nothing but 
mindless sex.”  This story is filled with nothing but mindless sex, but 
it’s well written and at least moderately interesting.  The basic 
premise is that the three female cousins get caught masturbating 
together, and instead of apologizing they announce that they enjoy sex 
and are proud to be sluts.  Their parents respond by throwing a party 
for them at which they will be able to demonstrate their sexual 
abilities by performing every kind of sexual act imaginable.  The 
description of the ensuing orgy is well written and vivid.  Orgy 
enthusiasts will possibly be impressed.

I guess this kind of activity could be fun; but if anyone ever throws 
an orgy for me, I would appreciate it if they would skip letting Rex 
the German Shepherd fuck me.  Actually, this story comes with two 
variations of Part 2; and the second version skips the dog and has the 
girl get simultaneously fucked by three men instead.  The author read 
my mind!

Although it was described in comprehensive detail, I did not find the 
orgy to be all that arousing.  I did not get even a little bit wet in 
my vagina, nor did I have an urge to wake my husband up when I went to 
bed afterwards.  This may be because we had already had delightful sex 
earlier in the morning; but I think the reason may also be that I 
subconsciously felt enough is enough.  I have certainly enjoyed orgy 
stories before, but this one took special delight in incest and in the 
notion that it was really neat to have the parents feeding their 
children sexually to the horny crowd.  

I acknowledge that I respect the incest taboo as a valid prohibition; 
but I also maintain that I am able to suspend that taboo in my 
imagination while reading fiction.  I can understand that with the 
right setup it could be extremely erotic to read about a child having 
sex with a parent; but there is no setup here. The author simply 
demands that the reader believe that there’s something special about 
sex just because it involves parents with their children.  I just don’t 
see the point in this.

Finally, I like orgies better when they’re a bit more spontaneous.  
This story resembled a modern, slick porn movie with no plot - just sex 
and more sex.  I sometimes find such movies to be stimulating - 
depending on what else is happening to me at the time or what else is 
on my mind; but I would rather see a less explicit movie with a sexy 
plot.  Ideally, I’d like to see a porn movie with a sexy plot; but not 
many talented actors and actresses seem to feel called to copulate with 
strangers in front of a camera.  I don’t need much of a reason - the 
rationale for the orgy described by this same author in “My Wedding” 
was sufficient, as are all the rationales I’ve seen so far in Mark 
Aster’s Allen Sisters stories; but I like to see a bit of creative plot 
or personality injected into the orgy.

Ratings for “The Party”
Athena (technical quality): 9
Venus (plot & character): 10
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 7

"Brief Visitor" by Sunrain (an648227@anon.penet.fi).  The ladies have 
gone camping in the woods.  One of them wanders off alone and is 
approached by an alien from outer space in a barn.  She doesn’t get a 
good look at the alien, but it does a good job on her with its 
tentacles.  I would have liked to have seen some more plot development 
in this story.  As it is, the woman just gets fondled and fucked by the 
unseen alien, and that’s about it.  English is not the author’s first 
language, and so there are some mistakes - usually omitted words or 
correct spellings of incorrect words; but he/she did a lot better than 
I would have done writing about sex in a foreign language.

Ratings for “Brief Visitor”
Athena (technical quality): 7
Venus (plot & character): 6
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 6

“Liar, Liar” by SueNH (SueNH@aol.com).  About a year ago a person with 
a warped sense of humor posted a message on a.s.s. stating that SueNH 
was not a real person but rather merely a front for an alleged money-
making scheme of some kind.  Sue (who I have reason to believe really 
exists) wrote this story in retaliation.

The protagonist of the story is a man who gets his sexual kicks by 
hiding in anonymity while making untrue statements about beautiful, 
lusty women who write hot stories on the Internet.  He likes these 
stories and even jerks off while reading them, but instead of doing 
something artistic in return, he responds in his uncreative, anonymous, 
cowardly manner.  This makes him feel bigger, more powerful - it 
provides a kinky sort of sexual turn-on for him. Just thinking about it 
makes his cock harden in his jogging shorts as he begins his run, and 
his little nipples get hard and show through his T-shirt as he start to 
work up a sweat within a block of his house.

Shortly after he starts his run, he spots a beautiful woman jogger.  He 
follows her and is eventually astonished to discover that she has 
stopped at his house and obviously wants to come inside.  She enters 
the house and teases him sexually, eventually binding him to the bed 
and revealing herself to be SueNH, the very person to whom he had 
directed his cowardly criticism on the Internet.  Sue continues to 
tease him and brings herself to orgasm several times.  She leaves it up 
to him to decide whether he’ll repent and gain genuine pleasure or 
continue to live his miserable, craven existence.

Reality check:  This jerk runs five or six miles in about a half hour.  
I’m in good shape and can’t do that - and I’m usually not encumbered by 
a hard-on.  If Sue revises this story, she should either drop the 
distance to 3 or 4 miles or up the time to 45 minutes.

This is an unusual and interesting story.  I don’t normally like sexual 
violence, and neither does Sue.  But no real harm comes to this 
asshole, and he deserves the discomfort her gets.  People who are 
familiar with Sue’s other stories (many of which are currently being 
reposted) will enjoy this story the most.

Ratings for “Liar, Liar”
Athena (technical quality): 10
Venus (plot & character): 9
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 9


