Note: This story was dynamically reformatted for online reading convenience.
 
 Continuing my series as an astral-travelling voyeur, one with paedophilic
interests I'm ashamed to say.  Episode 1 explains the concept more fully.
   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
   EPISODE 3.
   So, what next?  Well...  nudity.
   Foremost in my mind now was to see a young girl naked.  After the
frustration of the last episode - the excellence of the cock-suck tempered
by the disappointment of her never getting her clothes off for it - I
really wanted a good look at a little girl's body in its glory.  I'm
thinking back to that thought I had: what difference is there really
between a girl's body at 9ish and a boy's?  The obvious, sexual organs,
yes. But apart from that?  Just as I was honing in on what scenario I
wanted, it occurred to me I don't necessarily have to see sex (child sex
abuse, that is) going on in order to voyeur on some nudity.  You see,
`voyeur' was the key word.  With my power, I could easily roam around my
own neighbourhood and look in on girls I already know, or part-know.  Yep,
I could watch a preteen girl or two known to me in everyday life, and watch
her as she is in some private moment in nothing but her flesh!  Hot, hot
hot!  Taking a bath or shower, for example, or getting ready for bed.  It
would be trippy - the guilt-thrill of seeing her in this way, knowing I'll
be seeing her round and about in normal life again - yet she nor anybody
else knowing about it!  It's a good neighbourhood, and it's hugely doubtful
whether any of them would be getting sexually molested at all, but you
never know.
   So, this time I take a little break from watching child abuse, just to
do my aesthetic little survey of preteen girls' bodies.  I was wondering
about `comparison', let's not forget, so into the bargain I need to see a
typical boy of that age naked too.  So, I dredge up in my memory a couple
of good girl specimens I know and a good-looking boy.  Ages need to be
9-10, before the effects of puberty hit in the girls, but I don't want any
younger than this because it's obvious they all look alike when they're
very small.  The specimens are Bethany (a neighbour's daughter, 9) and
Kimberly (a more distant neighbour, 10).  I've chosen two girls for the
experiment, as females' physiques are by nature more varied, all through
life.  Less so in childhood, though.  One boy will do - Jake (9) - a
typical nimble build and nice face.
   First it's off to Bethany.  I watch her in the bath, getting fresh and
clean for school the next day, bless her.  It's so important to them, even
at that age!  Her mother, who flits in and out of the bathroom a few times,
did not have to nag her.  Bethany is largely left to herself, but her
mother helps with shampooing and rinsing her hair.  It's blonde, a good
length, and her build is slight with no real feminine feature to it if
we're to be objective about it.  Her cunt, yes of course, which I get a
good look at it before and after the bath, undressing and towelling.  I'm
taken aback by how small and tight it looks, the only thing to be made of
it basically being two compact outer labia and a tiny slit.  Hairless, as
expected.  I think the line of her lower tummy is intrinsically female,
though, curving under to the point of her vulva.  This correlates with the
slight perkiness of her bottom, but the buttocks are very small, almost
disappointing really.  I was partly hoping for more `female' buttocks, or
at least a `bubble butt'.  The whole surpasses the sum of its parts,
though. Here is genetically lightweight 9-year-old girl (her mother is a
slim adult), before any puberty has stirred, and the sight is fucking
exquisite.  Golden skin (obviously healthy, well-nourished), sheer
smoothness all over and nothing to see on her chest but nipples and a
ribcage.
   She's a quiet girl, lovely natured.  She was in my back garden earlier
this summer, when her mum was round, and I saw her trying cartwheels.  Her
skirt came right down and knickers showed when she was upside down, yet she
was utterly innocent about it.  Meanwhile, there was me trying to imagine
her little cunt, and finally now I have seen it.  No doubt she'll give me
that sweet smile when I see her again: she has NO idea!  She is one of
life's blessed by birth, never to be abused, unlike the many unluckier
little souls I shall encounter on my `travels'.  One day, though, she'll
fuck.  I wonder how old and with whom, and how she performs and enjoys. 
Oh, innocence!
   I know Kimberly less well.  I've barely ever got close enough to hear
her talk, but I see her going to and fro from school a lot.  She's a more
outstanding beauty, not merely `cute'.  She's taller, yet possibly even
thinner despite being in the year above.  She's also blonde, but her fine
mane reaches right down to her arse.  I always find that astonishing,
although it's not so unusual in girls this age, is it?  It's a skinny arse,
in keeping with her frame.  I'm watching her undress for bed, changing into
her pyjamas.  I honestly could not tell any difference between her butt and
Bethany's, in themselves.  It's just the height of their bodies that
suggest any difference.  Once again, no breasts whatsoever and no pubic
hair.  The smallness of Kimberly's cunt seems somehow at odds with her
overall aura of `class princess'.  The boys MUST look on her as the number
1, or close to it, and she's so obviously going to go through life as one
everybody wishes they could fuck.  A distinctive turned up nose makes her
seem a little haughty, but I suspect she's in fact modest and quiet, and
not yet understanding of how she is `noticed'.  Her changes have got to be
close, and I think she's had a growth spurt recently but only upwards.
   Before getting another look at either of the girls, I pay 9-year-old
Jake a visit and wait for a naked moment.  It comes at bath time, but here
the mother had to push him a little.  He's something of an erratic
personality, is Jake, but basically sweet natured.  He has short-cropped
fair hair, a pale slim body which I think is destined to be a good build
for a middle distance runner.  His height is in between Bethany's and
Kimberly's, and I really can't decide whether he's a tad broader than both.
Shoulders, arms and ribs seem just as bony as theirs, and hardly any
stronger.  His flesh is paler than the golden-tanned Kimberly, and slightly
more so than Bethany too, but it's all equally as smooth right down to the
lack of pubic hair.  The small balls and penis is needless to say a
difference.  The last time I ever watched a male undress was 30 years ago,
when I was at school, surreptitiously taking a glance of my 15-year-old
best friend.  This time, however, I'm staring and it's had quite an impact
on my sensibilities.  When his butt came into view, stooping there on the
bathroom floor, I was a little shocked by my arousal at the sight of crack.
My 9-year-old neighbour, Jake's little anal crack.
   Oh man, really I would do it.  In another episode I shall have to watch
a boy get buggered.  Curiosity, a small streak of gay libido in me, call it
what you will.
   Well, the matter in hand: there is no difference whatsoever between
Jake's bum and Bethany's bum, and therefore negligible difference to
Kimberly's either.  I'm surprised to note that Jake's even has the same
hint of perkiness as Bethany's.  At first I wondered if it had even more,
but that's just the fascination of noticing this feature on a boy, I think.
Maybe Jake's abdomen does not have that curve, but even this may be an
illusion.  Take away his penis stalk, replace it with a vagina, and the
contour would be the same I suspect.
   I have to conclude that, in principle, there is NO DIFFERENCE between a
pre-pubescent girl's physique and a pre-pubescent boy's.  If anything, a
girl at 10 can tend to be `longer'.  Neither sex has an outward hip curve.
Viewed in nakedness from behind, with their head hair taken out of the
equation, I do not believe I could tell the difference between girl and
boy. More interesting still, viewed from front if their hair was cropped
into identical styles and their genitals blocked out, I do not think I
could tell the difference between girl and boy.  There is no intrinsic
difference in their faces, if a good-looking boy and girl are compared,
unless she's wearing a bit of make-up.  Chests are chests, whether it be
girl or boy, although a few girls may sprout tits prematurely.  The skin of
both sexes is so identically tender all over, whether it be bottoms or
chest, and their faces are sweet.
   Well, this has to raise interesting questions over my libido, the
paedophile part of it at any rate.
   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
   Oh well, next up some sexual action to see.  What do you reckon I should
seek out?
   ep1968@hotmail.co.uk 
  
Pedo Voyeur 3