A pedo blog 8: Lower Limits. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This is not a story. The purpose of this blog is simply to let out thoughts. To let out `honest' thoughts. Everything in it is the truth, with no embellishment and no lies. That truth is that I love children - girls predominantly - and would like to have sex with them. `Pedo Blog 1' summarizes my tastes and style. Today I'll reflect on my 'lower limits'. That means the youngest age of girl I feel could possibly get aroused over, enough to enjoy some kind of sexual interaction with. I know for some guys with pedo feelings this young end of the range is the bee's knees. Not so with me. If I had to choose, I would certainly take a girl around the 10 years of age mark. My outlook has changed over the years, though, and now I find I at least have 'room' in my libido for considerably younger than this. How much younger? I'll give my answer at the end (for a bit of suspense, hehe). Before I was 30, I was what might be called 'normal' in that a girl of about 13 was the limit for me. This, whatever sanctimonious folk might say, is a perfectly natural watershed for a man's sexual attraction. She is getting tits, she is breedable, she begins to attract the eye at this age. Many guys could get an erection over her and be only too happy to fuck her given the right (and boy how I wish we had the right!). Well, I began to notice younger. I remember one particular borderline girl who I knew was only 12, and I used to watch her and think 'yep there is enough there to be interested in'. Particularly, I noticed her bra strap outline under her clothing, for some reason. Also her arse-shape and size. To cut a long story short, in my thirties I began to 'notice' girls under 12. This was especially during a spell of working in primary schools. The top year there, 10-11 years old one day seemed to strike me as cute: well, of course they're 'cute', but here I was thinking cute in a sexual way. This was significant, a bridge of the libido that was crossed. 'Prepubescent'. No development (to speak of). Not blossomed female. A 'child'. This was paedophilia. Yikes. Oh well, it was how I felt, and I might as well admit I would enjoy 'sex' with them. Cute little arses, sweet little faces, occasionally little tits as a bonus but it didn't matter if they didn't have any. That was the next bridge, a more specific one, but it intensified the desire for sure. I mean actually liking a 'flat chest': finding it an attractive feature, being sexually aroused BECAUSE she has a felt chest not 'in spite of'. You imagine feeling it, kissing it and licking it, perhaps cumming over it (although that seems a waste, as ultimately you really want to orgasm by fucking or sodomising). The flat chest thing opened the door of my mind to younger. I thought, if 10 then why not 9 or even 8. I stopped about there, though, perhaps 7 at a stretch (no pun intended). Essentially, thopse ages were no different, just a tad shorter and skinnier but basically the same bodies: 'girl child'. Below that, however, seems different to me. Their characters are more babyish, and bodies truly small. Their faces seem to not have developed the sexy princess look yet, instead just a bit silly and doll-like. They can be very pretty, though, it depends on the girl. The main problem, it seems to me, is that they're just to small to envisage 'action' with: fitting a penis in them, getting any kind of realistic kissing going. I mean imagine their response (lack of it) to mouth-kisses. Frustrating and hopeless I would think, whereas an over-7 could be at least taught the motions. Nevertheless, to cut a long story short I feel I could go down to... um... 4 at lowest. She would have to have the right kind of look for me. I've seen quite a few. I don't think it would be 'sex' as with a 9-year-old, say, who you could enjoy all kinds of positions and penetrations and communication with. Girls in the 4-6 range would be more general touchy-feely stuff, some mouth-work for sure, finger-pokes perhaps. Just maybe very tentative tries at worse if I could get past the shame of it. Yep, I must admit there's a few times I've set eyes on pretty little 5-year-old(ish) and thought 'oh man I'd love my cock in that little mouth.' No way could I go any lower. That would be just sick. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Email me at any time to discuss contents of these blogs, or you can suggest a theme or angle for me to take in the next blog. Ep1968@hotmail.co.ukPedo Blog 8