Note: This story was dynamically reformatted for online reading convenience.
 
 A pedo blog 21: Child sex-bots of the future?
   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
   This is not a story.  The purpose of this blog is simply to let out
thoughts.  To let out `honest' thoughts.  They are thoughts which remain in
the realm of fantasy, I must stress.  Everything in it is the truth, with
no embellishment and no lies.  That truth is that I love children - girls
predominantly - and would like to have sex with them.  `Pedo Blog 1'
summarizes my tastes and style.
   In this episode I want to think about a sci-fi scenario, although this
is perhaps not all that far from reality.  It has been said that very
realistic sex androids will be created soon.  The implication of that is
that realistic 'children' might also be created to satisfy pedo desires. 
Inevitably, the puritanical/feminist/sex-abuse brigade are up in arms even
just thinking about this (years before it even fucking happens). 
Personally, I think, why the hell not?  It would stop real girls/kids being
harmed, and give a much needed outlet for many guys.  However, I don't want
to moralize just now, but contemplate in what form these bots might take,
and how I would like them to be.
   There could be 3 basic types of child-sex bot.  We'll limit it to girls
here, because they are my thing.
   Type 1: fully realistic girl-child, in body and 'mind'.  Therefore, she
would be as reluctant/innocent/curious as as a normal girl, and the user
would have to seduce/groom/coerce or downright force.  When the technology
is refined, there might be many shades of personality within this category,
which the user could request.  The most important thing with this type is
that the physical consequences of fucking her would be realistic, eg
hazards of damaging her organs, and penetration authentically difficult to
achieve (depends on her exact age).  She could be programmed to react
realistically to whatever is done to her.  She's only a bot at the end of
the day, so the user decides for himself how he wants to 'play'.  She'll be
programmed in a certain way to react to your behaviour, though, so if you
play it wrongly you might fail in your seduction and have to resort to
force.
   Type 2a: half-realistic.  She has all the physical attributes as above,
but is designed to be unrealistically 'willing'.  Let's say she is 9 years
old (designed to be 9, that is).  In effect, what you have here is a child
in body but she has a sex-drive, a desire for sex.  She'd be much like many
very implausible pedo stories written online, but could be a lot of fun if
that's what you want.  Be careful, though - despite her willingness, her
body could easily be hurt, vagina or anus torn, jaws dislocated etc.
   Type 2b: if you carelessly or heartlessly do damage her, she begins to
lose her enthusiasm and develops into type 1, a realist girl-child who does
not hanker after sex.
   Type 3: idealised, non-realistic fuck-doll.  Here the body looks just as
real as the real thing, but when it comes down to it, she can be fucked as
hard as you damned well like, in any hole, and will not 'break' or bleed or
anything else hurtful.  She feels perhaps only the same pain an adult
female would feel in hard sex.  We have a real-looking child, but genitalia
and jaws of complete robustness, and a total willingness to have sex.
   All 3 types can come in any age and the looks (race, physique, hair etc)
you want, and given a name of your choice.  So, what would you choose?  I'd
love to hear opinions.  You can probably tell by the amount of explanation
I gave each type, which one I would choose.  However, at various times I'd
enjoy all the types for the sheer curiosity of it.  I'll 'program' my ideal
girl in the next blog.
   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
   Would love any feedback on this?  Email me at any time to discuss
contents of these blogs, or you can suggest a theme or angle for me to take
in the next blog.  Ep1968@hotmail.co.uk 
  
Pedo Blog 21