Subject: Re: {ASSD} Dirty Stories on Usenet & YahooGroups
From: cmsix <cmsix@storiesonline.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:50:37 -0500
Message-ID: <1223855190_5977@pro-front01.com>
References: <n393f4ht7f7ino7qf5f4jv8ajittcjh59n@4ax.com> <onv4f4527t6lp48fv07m0kj2rvdblhjfs2@4ax.com>
Bytes: 6043
Lines: 134
Organization: Pronews.com
Path: not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sex.stories.d
Reply-to: cmsix <cmsix@storiesonline.org>
X-Proxy-User: $$no5i9e52ym9x
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 081011-0, 10/11/2008), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to <abuse@pronews.com>. Forward a copy of ALL headers INCLUDING the body. (DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS)
X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Pronews.com does not condone,support,nor tolerate spam or any illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Comments: This message was posted through Pronews.com
===================
"PlainBill" <PlainBill47@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:onv4f4527t6lp48fv07m0kj2rvdblhjfs2@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:19:23 -0500, Damaeus
> <no-mail@hotmail.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>I have some questions concerning sexually graphic text posted to
>>usenet newsgroups and e-mail lists for the public from within the
>>United States. I hope to get some discussions going about whether
>>or
>>not these "dirty stories" contribute to child molestation and/or
>>rape,
>>or if they actually relieve the fantasies some pedophiles need to
>>have, but perhaps need some material to work with from those who are
>>skilled with the words of language.
>>
>>My thinking is that perhaps if these types of stories were read by
>>more people, including kids, it might prepare them earlier on to
>>know
>>what human nature is really like instead of having it suddenly cast
>>upon them when they are finally "allowed" into adult bookstores and
>>video stores to figure out what sex really means.
>>
>>If both men and boys wrote out their fantasies in text and posted
>>them
>>to usenet newsgroups and mailing lists, it would give both sides of
>>the aisle a chance to know each others' fantasies from a safe
>>distance
>>and environment. It may turn out that some boys already have rape
>>fantasies like I did when I was a kid, and if enough people from all
>>ages shared these things, we'd learn a lot more about each other and
>>what approaches to take to get to know each other and play in fun
>>and
>>safe ways without just having one side or the other take what they
>>want and leave the other in the gutter to rot.
>>
>>I'm not here to judge any level of deviance as any worse or better
>>than another. I'm just after information. That said, here are the
>>questions:
>>
>>
>>Sexually-graphic stories can contain characters of many ages. Are
>>there any distinctions made in law concerning any character ages or
>>age difference limitations?
>>
>>What if the boy is just doing something by himself in the nude which
>>you describe in a way that's anatomically correct, with detailed
>>descriptions of every curve, line and detail?
>>
>>What if the story contains all boys, and they're all aged 6 to 17?
>>
>>What if the boys are described in such a way that makes their bodies
>>something impossible to be formed by evolution? For example,
>>suppose
>>he's a 7-year-old muscleboy with an 8-inch flaccid penis and balls
>>that hang halfway to his knees who can't be hurt? A story like that
>>surely can't lead anyone to believe they would find something like
>>that walking around any old schoolyard, right? And suppose he's so
>>super-tough that you could pick him up and throw him down a row of
>>bleachers without him crying or complaining about it or whining that
>>it hurt. He would just feel it and get the fuck up and out of your
>>way, or get it again! What if the kid is mentally twisted so he
>>hates
>>people being nice to him, making all of the above not abuse, but
>>love?
>>Suppose he actually likes being treated that way?
>>
>>Thanks for the input...
> Sorry, I haven't bothered to read beyond the first paragraph; more
> entertaining events have my attention. However, here are a couple
> of
> points.
>
> This question has been asked repeatedly - or answered with an
> indictment of sexually explicit literature - for over a century. In
> the 60's a study was done comparing the prevalence of sex crimes in
> European countries where sexual material was freely available to the
> occurance of those same crimes in the US. Rather surprisingly (at
> the
> time) was the conclusion that if anything there was a reverse
> effect.
> Countries with a more relaxed attitude had a LOWER incidence of
> criminal sexual conduct.
>
> The same question was asked officially in the 70's by the Nixon
> administration under the auspices of Attorney General Edwin Meese.
> The Meese Report was so controversial that it was suppressed for
> months before being finally released. The conclusion was the free
> availability of erotic literature to ALL ages reduced criminal
> sexual
> conduct at all ages. The authors of the report admitted the idea of
> allowing teenages and pre-teens access to erotic literature was so
> controversial that they could not endorse it, but the evidence
> suggested it would be benificial.
You do realize the truth doesn't really come into play don't you. It
is simple.
Politicians make laws. Politicians are not concerned about the truth
and actually don't care a thing about it. Therefore any laws have
nothing to do with anything having to do with the truth in any for or
fashion.
cmsix
>
> PlainBill
---- Posted via Pronews.com - Premium Corporate Usenet News Provider ----
http://www.pronews.com offers corporate packages that have access to 100,000+ newsgroups