Path: not-for-mail
From: Jordan Shelbourne <jordanshelbourne@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.sex.stories.d
Subject: Re: {ASSD} Size and Quality
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:42:32 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <3ea5ed75-334a-44bf-a6bb-7d7918cbbe50@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
References: <2bfa7580-d60c-43cc-99a0-3da95b646f65@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <480ce893$0$31961$4c5eba9e@news.getnet.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.236.121.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1208806953 18637 127.0.0.1 (21 Apr 2008 19:42:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:42:33 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=99.236.121.4; posting-account=LozjlAoAAACf4rMYfHDA466nRYJmLtZ5
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
===================
On Apr 21, 3:18 pm, "K. E. Taylor" <None_@this_time> wrote:
> Jordan Shelbourne wrote:
> > So the question is, why is size treated as an indicator of quality is
> > many stories?
>
> > The idea that a big cock or big breasts (or for that matter, a big
> > clit or big vulva or a big vagina) are an indicator of quality
> > underlies many stories--heck, growth stories are pretty much based on
> > the idea.
>
> > Is this a male thing, to think that bigger is better? Is this an idea
> > that occurs in the culture? Is it historically or archeologically
> > common?
>
> >
> Well, being new to the whole sexy story thing, I try to focus on
> feelings and emotions. Size, of anything, gets mentioned once, then, I
> try to forget it.
>
> I like focusing on things like eyes, hair color, smiles. Of course, I'm
> new to this, so I have rose colored glasses right now.
>
> --
> K.E. Taylor
Oh, I agree with you, but so many stories include his big manhood when
there's no reason to, or laugh at cuckolds because of their pathetic
tiny dicks. (Hmmm. There's a story: the well-hung cuckold. Should do
something with that.) That indicates to me that some portion of
society really does believe that a bigger dick = bigger pleasure, or
that a woman with bigger breasts will have more fun than a woman with
smaller breasts. So is this kind of thinking reserved for men, or is
it reserved for a specific segment of the population with both sexes?
There are people who want bigger; I don't dispute that, just like I
don't dispute that there are people who want smaller. Bigger can be a
problem if you're all about giving blowjobs, for example, or bigger
might stretch the vagina in uncomfortable ways. But the idea is so
prevalent in porn, that I suspect it's a male thing: bigger is almost
always better, they think, so a big cock *must* be better.