Path: not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:18:41 -0700
From: "K. E. Taylor" <None_@this_time>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.sex.stories.d
Subject: Re: {ASSD} Size and Quality
References: <2bfa7580-d60c-43cc-99a0-3da95b646f65@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <2bfa7580-d60c-43cc-99a0-3da95b646f65@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <480ce893$0$31961$4c5eba9e@news.getnet.net>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@getnet.net
Bytes: 1624
===================
Jordan Shelbourne wrote:
> So the question is, why is size treated as an indicator of quality is
> many stories?
>
> The idea that a big cock or big breasts (or for that matter, a big
> clit or big vulva or a big vagina) are an indicator of quality
> underlies many stories--heck, growth stories are pretty much based on
> the idea.
>
> Is this a male thing, to think that bigger is better? Is this an idea
> that occurs in the culture? Is it historically or archeologically
> common?
>
Well, being new to the whole sexy story thing, I try to focus on
feelings and emotions. Size, of anything, gets mentioned once, then, I
try to forget it.
I like focusing on things like eyes, hair color, smiles. Of course, I'm
new to this, so I have rose colored glasses right now.
--
K.E. Taylor