Path: not-for-mail
From: Jordan Shelbourne <jordanshelbourne@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.sex.stories.d
Subject: {ASSD} Size and Quality
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:03:26 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <2bfa7580-d60c-43cc-99a0-3da95b646f65@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.9.243.111
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1208797407 18866 127.0.0.1 (21 Apr 2008 17:03:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:03:27 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com; posting-host=216.9.243.111; posting-account=LozjlAoAAACf4rMYfHDA466nRYJmLtZ5
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
===================
So the question is, why is size treated as an indicator of quality is
many stories?
The idea that a big cock or big breasts (or for that matter, a big
clit or big vulva or a big vagina) are an indicator of quality
underlies many stories--heck, growth stories are pretty much based on
the idea.
Is this a male thing, to think that bigger is better? Is this an idea
that occurs in the culture? Is it historically or archeologically
common?