Path: not-for-mail
From: Brandon D Cartwright <user@example.net>
Newsgroups: alt.sex.stories,alt.sex.stories.d,alt.callahans,alt.support.boy-lovers,alt.freemasonry,alt.fan.frank.mccoy
Subject: Re: from the ones who *really* know
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:55:59 -0800
Lines: 96
Message-ID: <rq6tn3d17g1ok85u0mm7o8pp3bs7ftpct4@4ax.com>
References: <Xns9A198FC1AF11Fgasolineandbile@66.250.146.159> <flh5on$uq5$1@aioe.org> <Xns9A19A0AE89F90LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net> <20080104013433.A46B063A22@panta-rhei.eu.org> <Xns9A1B775B243ACLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net> <Xns9A1B7BE79F346fort5678@216.151.153.13>
Reply-To: as@if.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
X-No-Archive: Yes
===================
On 04 Jan 2008 20:13:31 GMT, "TomBa -<NP-f36>-" <somebody@thefort.org>
wrote:
>ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
>news:Xns9A1B775B243ACLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:
>
>> On 03 Jan 2008 I stormed the castle called alt.support.incest and heard
>> Baal cry out in news:20080104013433.A46B063A22@panta-rhei.eu.org...
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA512
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 02 January 2008 18:45, in alt.support.boy-lovers,
>>> in Message-ID: <Xns9A19A0AE89F90LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net>,
>>> ThePsyko wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02 Jan 2008 I stormed the castle called alt.support.boy-lovers and
>>>> heard hairlessballs cry out in news:flh5on$uq5$1@aioe.org...
>>>>
>>>>> The "stranger danger" thing was and is idiotic when taken to the
>>>>> usual extremes - but *every* societal response to pedophilia *is*
>>>>> taken to extremes. All it does is foster fear and hatred of any
>>>>> stranger and deflect attention from the greatest fatality risk to
>>>>> children - their own family.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, the whole pedo outrage industry deflects attention from:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) the most significant and dangerous risks to babies.
>>>>> Statistically,
>>>>> who kills the largest numbers of children? Crazed pyschopathic
>>>>> pedophiles? Axe murderers? Freddy Kruger? No.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mothers! That's right. Mothers kill more of their own children
>>>>> than any other segment of society, many times more than sex
>>>>> offenders.
>>>>
>>>> ah yes.. the old "but they're worse!" dodge.
>>>
>>> It's not a dodge. The fact of the matter is, that any professional
>>> will tell you that in the overwhelming majority of abuse cases, the
>>> offender is known to the child. Why then, is the majority of effort
>>> put into 'stranger danger,' especially strangers on the Internet?
>>> There's a much higher probability that if your child is being abused,
>>> that's it's someone that you already know.
>>
>> When an arguement is made that
>>
>> A is bad
>>
>> replying that B is worse is a dodge, or at the very least an attempt to
>> deflect from the fact that A is bad, when in fact whether or not B is
>> worse really has no impact on whether A is bad.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>When the argument is made that A and/or B cause C, and C is to be
>avoided; and that A contributes 10% while B contributes 90% toward C, why
>expend the majority of your resources trying to eliminate A? If you
>really wanted to reduce C, wouldn't reducing B be more effective?
>
>Perhaps reducing C is not really the goal, but a red herring that
>justifies attacking A...
Paranoia?
neutralizing sex predators,such as yourself, is certainly a part of
child protection initiatives..the point is the protection of children
not attacking you..
If you kept your hands to yourself and your dick in your pants you
wouldn't have to worry would you?
Well..you would still have to worry about your child pornography
ring being traced back to you I guess....
--
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:56:00 -0800, Tim Merrigan <tppm@ca.rr.com> wrote:
Picture ID <http://www.boston-baden.com/hazel/Pix/p.cgi?2001+0453-03+lasfs245v.jpg+453>
Message-ID: <7rrin318df4j6h1lfg61tu6rb5d0fp1lc6@4ax.com>
>Six of one half a dozen of the other. I kind of like the image of a
>toddler dressed up all sexy, with a thong or crotchless panties. But
>I also like the image of her completely innocent/ignorant accidental
>or even deliberate exposures.