Subject: Re: {ASSM} Sex Ed Notes by Rachael Ross (SciFi, Fantasy, etc.)
From: Van Falmouth <vanfal@sdf.lonestar.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:37:51 +0000
Message-ID: <eg3qev$e0q$1@chessie.cirr.com>
Bytes: 3041
Lines: 46
NNTP-Posting-Host: freeshell.org
Organization: Central Iowa (Model) Railroad, Plano, TX, USA
Path: not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sex.stories.d
X-Trace: chessie.cirr.com 1160080671 14362 192.94.73.30 (5 Oct 2006 20:37:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cirr.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:37:51 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (NetBSD/2.1.0_STABLE (alpha))
===================
rache696@yahoo.com posted on ASSM in ASSTR Message-ID:
<54635asstr$1160025004@assm.asstr.org>:
>...
>Please note that this is intended to provide background material for
>the Dabara series of short stories ...
>...
Let's see. Rache has redesigned the sexual apparatus for her
characters in the "Dabara" series. Her men, once fucking begins,
have their cocks locked into her women's vaginas for half an hour
after ejaculation, both by constriction of the vagina's "hymeneal
muscle" and by rear-projecting barbs on the cock (ouch!).
Impregnation is rare because ovaries release eggs less than a dozen
times in any woman's life, with ovulation, susceptibility and menses
lasting a month. If successful the woman bears the brat, presumably
as usual, but presents it to male tits for nourishment, said tits
having been stimulated to milk production by chemical substances
transferred from woman to man during the half-hour impregnation.
Female rape of the male, ascribed with the old feminist canard only
to dominance play, is plausible and more likely because her women are
larger than her men and because a woman's mere touch is still
apparently enough for a hard-on.
The above produces some small gain. Women profit by a great
reduction in menses occurrence and men by the pleasure of nourishing
their brats -- if their nipples don't get sore. Certain new tactical
issues will arise in relations between the sexes. Perhaps they are
Rache's real concern.
Male wet nurses is an interesting idea. As demonstrated by monkeys
and one flat-chested human mother of my acquaintance, the absence of
fatty deposits around the nipple is no bar to nutrient production.
Bring it on! -- as our drug industry may do.
But if human reproduction is to be redesigned, surely the answer is
marsupialism (if I may coin a word). Let the embryo be emitted into
the female pouch while still too small to be painful when passing
through the cervix. And let the marsupialism be mutual. A fetus of
six months or more might be transferred from mother's pouch to
father's and back again. Granted, you'd need tits inside both
pouches, which constitutes the only drawback apparent to me. I'm not
opposed to the new tits, merely to loss of the old!
Van Falmouth
vanfal@sdf.lonestar.org