Path: not-for-mail
From: Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.sex.stories.d,alt.bad.clams,alt.disgusting.stories.my-imagination,soc.men,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: {ASSD} What's up, gang? And who the HELL is this Fred Hall joker?
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:02:54 -0600
Organization: UADNA
Lines: 116
Message-ID: <duqmoc$6g$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
References: <1141954092.051839.280860@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: God
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: blackhelicopter.databasix.com 1141956174 208 blackhelicopter.databasix.com (10 Mar 2006 02:02:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@databasix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.2/32.830
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Hammer-Of-Thor: August 2005
===================
On 9 Mar 2006 17:28:12 -0800, "Evil Fantasies"
<badgirl_inblack@yahoo.com> wrote:
>No, I don't have any stories up yet. Yes, I've been busy. Deal with it.
>LOL
>
>And now, my own little special ass-chewing for "Wrong Said Fred":
>
>Hiya Freddy,
>
>Sooooo... you're here to dictate the thoughts and words of others, hmm?
> I really have to wonder why you're wasting your time posting these
>cunt-rants about stories which, let's face it, you wouldn't even be
>aware of, if you were not purposely seeking them out. Just WHAT are
>you doing here? Aren't guys like you usually out roasting weenies at
>the local book-burning rally for conservative tight-asses??? You know,
>thus far, every single post you have made to this group has been
>nothing more than a complete and utter display of hypocritical
>ignorance. In one keystroke, you condemn pedophiliac literature on the
>basis of indecency; in the next, you divulge that you have no problem
>with stories which describe *ANY* type of obscene behavior between
>adults. Hmmm... therefore, this must mean that you condone, and are an
>advocate of:
>
>*Rape
>*Murder
>*Necrophilia
>*Torture
>*Castration
>*Scat
>And the list goes on....
>
>In fact, you even went so far as to state your approval of sexual acts
>between humans and animals. Now, this is just my humble opinion, but,
>do you honestly believe that a man like yourself.... a man who, in one
>particular post, gave the proverbial green-light to bestiality
>aficionados worldwide that it's quote "ok with me, if they want to suck
>a dog's dick", is actually constructed of the highest moral fiber and
>is thereby an appropriate judge of right and wrong, as it pertains to
>sexuality??? Excuse me while I.......
>
>LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
>
>So, it's only ok for one to author a story about taking advantage of
>helpless animals??? Nice. Yes, your beautiful, pure & decent sole was
>TRULY casting it's radiance over the shadowy depths of PedPerv Land
>when you made THAT statement. We better watch our asses!!! Were in
>the presence of the second incarnation of Jesus Fucking Christ!
>
>I think there are a few things that a self-righteous DUNCE like
>yourself needs to be aware of:
>
>A. Words DO NOT = Action. A human thought is not a crime, unless acted
>upon. If this were not the case, I would be incarcerated at this very
>moment ... for the murder of over 2,000 people.
>
>B. The law states that everyone is a child until the age of 18. Are
>you saying that you have NEVER had even ONE naughty thought about a
>girl/boy/whatever who has not yet reached this age?
>
>C. Just because you don't approve of something somebody says, that
>doesn't give you the right to prohibit their Freedom of Speech. You
>have the right to state your disdain ... nothing more. So, you really
>need to stop popping off idle threats about getting authors sent up the
>river, based on the content of their FICTIONAL (do you know what that
>word means?) stories.
>
>D. More often than not, the biggest perverts are the very ones who run
>around playing the Saint/Savior role, and other sexually repressed
>squarepants personas. Yes, this means *YOU*. I know the type. You
>tiptoe to the comp while your wife sleeps, and quickly find yourself at
>the "Cherry-poppin Chicks With Dicks" homepage. The next 20 seconds of
>your pathetic life are spent bopping your bologna to some piss-poor
>quality MPEG of a 15 year old getting anally reemed-out by an obese
>tranny. Of course, after you spill your seed, the guilt sets in....
>AND NOW you must find a way to redeem yourself by making others feel
>inferior for their own carnal desires. What a limp-wristed titmouse
>you are.
>
>Ok, I think I've made my point here, but, I have one last thing to add.
> You know, I've had a particular story idea in my mind for some time
>now ... well, I have a lot of ideas, but not a lot of time to pen them
>... but anyhow, it's one of those "horny teen girl seduces hot older
>guy" themes. I'm 30, but I assure you that when I was a teenager, I
>entertained sexual thoughts about MEN, not boys, but MEN, who were at
>least twice my age. Now, are you gonna sit there and tell me that, if
>I find the time to compose said story and post it here, I am in
>violation of some imaginary law that prohibits me from expressing those
>feelings? Will I then be classified as a certified sicko, according to
>you? Oh, and allow me to pose another question:
>
>You're sifting through the contents of ASSD with a fine-toothed NetKop
>comb, as usual. Two stories with questionable content have been
>posted. You read them both. One is of a rape/snuff flavor, about a
>homicidal maniac who abducts ADULT females, (cause we all know Freddy
>says it's ok to abuse adults *wink*) rapes them repeatedly, burns them
>with cigarettes, and finally strangles them with their very own
>pantyhose. The second story depicts a consensual & mutually satisfying
>sexual relationship (God forbid the act of giving pleasure. We all know
>how EVIL that is. *smirk*) between a 16 year old girl and a 40 year old
>guy.
>
>The question is, which story do YOU find to be the most offensive
>and/or morally corrupt? If you choose the latter ... well.... I'm
>afraid all of your finger-pointing & criticism should be directed at
>your own image in the bathroom mirror.
Beautiful meltdown, kook.
--
"I can understand the motivations involved here by most men, but
you are beyond explaining, other than you are just a pure cunt. Do you
wish you had one, Is that your problem Fred? Fuck you Fred."
Socfroot Prarie Oyster in Message-ID: <eENPf.17943$vC4.12207@clgrps12>