Path: not-for-mail
From: Evil Fantasies <badgirl_inblack@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.sex.stories.d
Subject: Re: {ASSD} What's up, gang? And who the HELL is this Fred Hall joker?
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:11:06 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 121
Message-ID: <1141956666.805309.318380@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
References: <1141954092.051839.280860@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> <duqmoc$6g$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.132
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1141956671 30496 127.0.0.1 (10 Mar 2006 02:11:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:11:11 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <duqmoc$6g$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 6.0; Windows 98; ESB{B02C3C80-E344-11D8-BB5B-0000F8021E5D}),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 Turboweb [dtc-tb121 8.3.5], HTTP/1.0 cache-dtc-ac03.proxy.aol.com[CDBC7484] (Traffic-Server/5.4.2 [uScM])
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.188.116.132; posting-account=7i3xvA0AAABWezjXlYyFkQxR3rN2Dgf0
===================
Fred Hall wrote:
> On 9 Mar 2006 17:28:12 -0800, "Evil Fantasies"
> <badgirl_inblack@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >No, I don't have any stories up yet. Yes, I've been busy. Deal with it.
> >LOL
> >
> >And now, my own little special ass-chewing for "Wrong Said Fred":
> >
> >Hiya Freddy,
> >
> >Sooooo... you're here to dictate the thoughts and words of others, hmm?
> > I really have to wonder why you're wasting your time posting these
> >cunt-rants about stories which, let's face it, you wouldn't even be
> >aware of, if you were not purposely seeking them out. Just WHAT are
> >you doing here? Aren't guys like you usually out roasting weenies at
> >the local book-burning rally for conservative tight-asses??? You know,
> >thus far, every single post you have made to this group has been
> >nothing more than a complete and utter display of hypocritical
> >ignorance. In one keystroke, you condemn pedophiliac literature on the
> >basis of indecency; in the next, you divulge that you have no problem
> >with stories which describe *ANY* type of obscene behavior between
> >adults. Hmmm... therefore, this must mean that you condone, and are an
> >advocate of:
> >
> >*Rape
> >*Murder
> >*Necrophilia
> >*Torture
> >*Castration
> >*Scat
> >And the list goes on....
> >
> >In fact, you even went so far as to state your approval of sexual acts
> >between humans and animals. Now, this is just my humble opinion, but,
> >do you honestly believe that a man like yourself.... a man who, in one
> >particular post, gave the proverbial green-light to bestiality
> >aficionados worldwide that it's quote "ok with me, if they want to suck
> >a dog's dick", is actually constructed of the highest moral fiber and
> >is thereby an appropriate judge of right and wrong, as it pertains to
> >sexuality??? Excuse me while I.......
> >
> >LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
> >
> >So, it's only ok for one to author a story about taking advantage of
> >helpless animals??? Nice. Yes, your beautiful, pure & decent sole was
> >TRULY casting it's radiance over the shadowy depths of PedPerv Land
> >when you made THAT statement. We better watch our asses!!! Were in
> >the presence of the second incarnation of Jesus Fucking Christ!
> >
> >I think there are a few things that a self-righteous DUNCE like
> >yourself needs to be aware of:
> >
> >A. Words DO NOT = Action. A human thought is not a crime, unless acted
> >upon. If this were not the case, I would be incarcerated at this very
> >moment ... for the murder of over 2,000 people.
> >
> >B. The law states that everyone is a child until the age of 18. Are
> >you saying that you have NEVER had even ONE naughty thought about a
> >girl/boy/whatever who has not yet reached this age?
> >
> >C. Just because you don't approve of something somebody says, that
> >doesn't give you the right to prohibit their Freedom of Speech. You
> >have the right to state your disdain ... nothing more. So, you really
> >need to stop popping off idle threats about getting authors sent up the
> >river, based on the content of their FICTIONAL (do you know what that
> >word means?) stories.
> >
> >D. More often than not, the biggest perverts are the very ones who run
> >around playing the Saint/Savior role, and other sexually repressed
> >squarepants personas. Yes, this means *YOU*. I know the type. You
> >tiptoe to the comp while your wife sleeps, and quickly find yourself at
> >the "Cherry-poppin Chicks With Dicks" homepage. The next 20 seconds of
> >your pathetic life are spent bopping your bologna to some piss-poor
> >quality MPEG of a 15 year old getting anally reemed-out by an obese
> >tranny. Of course, after you spill your seed, the guilt sets in....
> >AND NOW you must find a way to redeem yourself by making others feel
> >inferior for their own carnal desires. What a limp-wristed titmouse
> >you are.
> >
> >Ok, I think I've made my point here, but, I have one last thing to add.
> > You know, I've had a particular story idea in my mind for some time
> >now ... well, I have a lot of ideas, but not a lot of time to pen them
> >... but anyhow, it's one of those "horny teen girl seduces hot older
> >guy" themes. I'm 30, but I assure you that when I was a teenager, I
> >entertained sexual thoughts about MEN, not boys, but MEN, who were at
> >least twice my age. Now, are you gonna sit there and tell me that, if
> >I find the time to compose said story and post it here, I am in
> >violation of some imaginary law that prohibits me from expressing those
> >feelings? Will I then be classified as a certified sicko, according to
> >you? Oh, and allow me to pose another question:
> >
> >You're sifting through the contents of ASSD with a fine-toothed NetKop
> >comb, as usual. Two stories with questionable content have been
> >posted. You read them both. One is of a rape/snuff flavor, about a
> >homicidal maniac who abducts ADULT females, (cause we all know Freddy
> >says it's ok to abuse adults *wink*) rapes them repeatedly, burns them
> >with cigarettes, and finally strangles them with their very own
> >pantyhose. The second story depicts a consensual & mutually satisfying
> >sexual relationship (God forbid the act of giving pleasure. We all know
> >how EVIL that is. *smirk*) between a 16 year old girl and a 40 year old
> >guy.
> >
> >The question is, which story do YOU find to be the most offensive
> >and/or morally corrupt? If you choose the latter ... well.... I'm
> >afraid all of your finger-pointing & criticism should be directed at
> >your own image in the bathroom mirror.
>
> Beautiful meltdown, kook.
>
> --
>
> "I can understand the motivations involved here by most men, but
> you are beyond explaining, other than you are just a pure cunt. Do you
> wish you had one, Is that your problem Fred? Fuck you Fred."
>
> Socfroot Prarie Oyster in Message-ID: <eENPf.17943$vC4.12207@clgrps12>
Not very perceptive, are ya, Cowchip?