Path: not-for-mail
From: Evil Fantasies <badgirl_inblack@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.sex.stories.d
Subject: {ASSD} What's up, gang? And who the HELL is this Fred Hall joker?
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:28:12 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 104
Message-ID: <1141954092.051839.280860@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.132
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1141954097 24368 127.0.0.1 (10 Mar 2006 01:28:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:28:17 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 6.0; Windows 98; ESB{B02C3C80-E344-11D8-BB5B-0000F8021E5D}),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 Turboweb [dtc-tb121 8.3.5], HTTP/1.0 cache-dtc-ac03.proxy.aol.com[CDBC7484] (Traffic-Server/5.4.2 [uScM])
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.188.116.132; posting-account=7i3xvA0AAABWezjXlYyFkQxR3rN2Dgf0
===================
No, I don't have any stories up yet. Yes, I've been busy. Deal with it.
LOL
And now, my own little special ass-chewing for "Wrong Said Fred":
Hiya Freddy,
Sooooo... you're here to dictate the thoughts and words of others, hmm?
I really have to wonder why you're wasting your time posting these
cunt-rants about stories which, let's face it, you wouldn't even be
aware of, if you were not purposely seeking them out. Just WHAT are
you doing here? Aren't guys like you usually out roasting weenies at
the local book-burning rally for conservative tight-asses??? You know,
thus far, every single post you have made to this group has been
nothing more than a complete and utter display of hypocritical
ignorance. In one keystroke, you condemn pedophiliac literature on the
basis of indecency; in the next, you divulge that you have no problem
with stories which describe *ANY* type of obscene behavior between
adults. Hmmm... therefore, this must mean that you condone, and are an
advocate of:
*Rape
*Murder
*Necrophilia
*Torture
*Castration
*Scat
And the list goes on....
In fact, you even went so far as to state your approval of sexual acts
between humans and animals. Now, this is just my humble opinion, but,
do you honestly believe that a man like yourself.... a man who, in one
particular post, gave the proverbial green-light to bestiality
aficionados worldwide that it's quote "ok with me, if they want to suck
a dog's dick", is actually constructed of the highest moral fiber and
is thereby an appropriate judge of right and wrong, as it pertains to
sexuality??? Excuse me while I.......
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
So, it's only ok for one to author a story about taking advantage of
helpless animals??? Nice. Yes, your beautiful, pure & decent sole was
TRULY casting it's radiance over the shadowy depths of PedPerv Land
when you made THAT statement. We better watch our asses!!! Were in
the presence of the second incarnation of Jesus Fucking Christ!
I think there are a few things that a self-righteous DUNCE like
yourself needs to be aware of:
A. Words DO NOT = Action. A human thought is not a crime, unless acted
upon. If this were not the case, I would be incarcerated at this very
moment ... for the murder of over 2,000 people.
B. The law states that everyone is a child until the age of 18. Are
you saying that you have NEVER had even ONE naughty thought about a
girl/boy/whatever who has not yet reached this age?
C. Just because you don't approve of something somebody says, that
doesn't give you the right to prohibit their Freedom of Speech. You
have the right to state your disdain ... nothing more. So, you really
need to stop popping off idle threats about getting authors sent up the
river, based on the content of their FICTIONAL (do you know what that
word means?) stories.
D. More often than not, the biggest perverts are the very ones who run
around playing the Saint/Savior role, and other sexually repressed
squarepants personas. Yes, this means *YOU*. I know the type. You
tiptoe to the comp while your wife sleeps, and quickly find yourself at
the "Cherry-poppin Chicks With Dicks" homepage. The next 20 seconds of
your pathetic life are spent bopping your bologna to some piss-poor
quality MPEG of a 15 year old getting anally reemed-out by an obese
tranny. Of course, after you spill your seed, the guilt sets in....
AND NOW you must find a way to redeem yourself by making others feel
inferior for their own carnal desires. What a limp-wristed titmouse
you are.
Ok, I think I've made my point here, but, I have one last thing to add.
You know, I've had a particular story idea in my mind for some time
now ... well, I have a lot of ideas, but not a lot of time to pen them
... but anyhow, it's one of those "horny teen girl seduces hot older
guy" themes. I'm 30, but I assure you that when I was a teenager, I
entertained sexual thoughts about MEN, not boys, but MEN, who were at
least twice my age. Now, are you gonna sit there and tell me that, if
I find the time to compose said story and post it here, I am in
violation of some imaginary law that prohibits me from expressing those
feelings? Will I then be classified as a certified sicko, according to
you? Oh, and allow me to pose another question:
You're sifting through the contents of ASSD with a fine-toothed NetKop
comb, as usual. Two stories with questionable content have been
posted. You read them both. One is of a rape/snuff flavor, about a
homicidal maniac who abducts ADULT females, (cause we all know Freddy
says it's ok to abuse adults *wink*) rapes them repeatedly, burns them
with cigarettes, and finally strangles them with their very own
pantyhose. The second story depicts a consensual & mutually satisfying
sexual relationship (God forbid the act of giving pleasure. We all know
how EVIL that is. *smirk*) between a 16 year old girl and a 40 year old
guy.
The question is, which story do YOU find to be the most offensive
and/or morally corrupt? If you choose the latter ... well.... I'm
afraid all of your finger-pointing & criticism should be directed at
your own image in the bathroom mirror.