Return To the Celestial Review (This does NOT open a new window)
Return To the Index (This does NOT open a new window)


Note, to make reading multi-part stories easier, story links (links with dejanews.com or www.qz.to, NOT the review or profile links) will open up a new browser window. When you are done reading the story, or section of the story simply CLOSE the story window.


"Rodney's Education" by Steve Getto (a boy and his sorceress) 8.5, 4.5, 6.0
http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=334193948


"Rodney's Education" by Steve Getto (sorceress@darktower.edu.au). Guest
review by jubjub.

Story Summary: Boy and a Sorceress.

This is an interesting story and it has distinct possibilities. However, as it
is written, it isn't anything special. I must admit, though, that the sexual
descriptions do get a response.

Technically, there are a number of small spelling and grammar errors, but the
greatest deduction was for the lack of flow. The sentences seemed, at times,
stilted. But, overall, the technical aspects were quite acceptable.

Considering that this is Part 1, I won't complain a lot about a lack of plot
and character. However, even an opening chapter should set up some character
depth and give the reader an idea of how the story will unfold. We know
nothing about these characters other than the profession and a vague idea of
their age. Worse, there is nothing in this story to suggest that it will
unfold as nothing more than a predictable dominatrix story--even with the
sorcery.

There is considerable sexual description but little actual sex. The scene
that ends Part 1 is what gives me the hope that as this series continues, the
author can continue with inventive sexual descriptions. I hope that this
invention will extend to both the setting and the sexual acts described. If
so, this series will definitely be one to keep on eye on.

Ratings for "Rodney's Education"
Technical: 8.5 Easy to follow sentences but lacks a distinct style
Characterization and Plot: 4.5 Reads more like an idea for a story
Personal Appeal: 6.0 The writer seems inhibited. A more
mysterious style would help.