Return To the Celestial Review (This does NOT open a new window)
Return To the Index (This does NOT open a new window)


Note, to make reading multi-part stories easier, story links (links with dejanews.com or www.qz.to, NOT the review or profile links) will open up a new browser window. When you are done reading the story, or section of the story simply CLOSE the story window.


* "Brenda's Conquest" by Tom Bombadil (emerging adolescence & romance) 10, 10, 10
http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=226971755


* "Brenda's Conquest" by Tom Bombadil (stbush@iglou.com).
http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=226971755

This is a story about a man who falls in love with a 13-year-old girl with
whom he has been familiar since she was nine. In addition, the girl's 11-year-
old sister develops a sexual relationship with his own 17-year-old sister.
There's a lot more to the story than this, but I am not going to go into the
details here. All I'll say here is that it's a rich, well-developed story that
presents a reasonable perspective on the problems as well as of the joys of
such a relationship.

The author himself refers to this as a "pedophile love story." Interestingly,
my on-line dictionary does not define pedophile or pedophilia. It goes
straight from pedometer to peduncle. Go figure. However, my on-line
encyclopedia does have an article on the topic, which says this:

"Pedophilia is a psychosexual disorder characterized by a sexual desire for
and sexual acts with prepubescent children. Onset of the disorder can occur
from adolescence through old age, and it occurs predominantly in males. About
two-thirds of pedophiliacs are attracted to children of the opposite sex.
Based on evidence from criminal court records, pedophiles usually know the
children that they abuse. Most pedophiles resort to deception rather than
force. Although much is known about pedophilia, pedophiles themselves are
difficult to treat and recidivism rates are high."

In the present story, the "pedophile" doesn't actually do what my encyclopedia
says pedophiles do; he simply develops a consensual relationship with a
thirteen-year-old whom he has known for several years. You will note that
although the author himself describes this as a pedophile love story, I myself
have referred to it as a story of emerging adolescence and romance.

Nonetheless, it is important to realize that this story deals with a topic
that sets of alarms in the minds of people who are concerned about children
being harmed by pornography on the Internet. As a teacher in an American
public school, I am supposed to call to the attention of the legal authorities
behavior that is typically labeled pedophilia, if I become aware of it. That's
the rules, folks; and I could get into trouble for not following them. I
hasten to add that I am NOT a member of the Thought Police. I work with a
large number of troubled adolescents, and I HAVE worked with the authorities
in cases that they refer to as pedophilia. In no case that I have witnessed
has the relationship been like that described in this story. Every case I have
ever seen has revealed children who had their lives screwed up by an
exploitive adult.

The notion of falling in love with an innocent and precocious young person is
intuitively appealing. This story idealizes that intuitive appeal.

It seems reasonable that society can differentiate between exploitive sex with
children (which is vividly described in Michael K. Smith's "Remembering") and
emotionally sensitive relationships like those described in this story. It is
my own belief that most children are best advised to reach a reasonable level
of maturity before becoming sexually active and that many adults who become
sexually active with children are likely to be satisfying their own (perhaps
unconscious) needs rather than being helpful to the children. In addition, a
very large number of psychologists seem to agree with my belief, and the laws
of most countries in Western society support my position.

On the other hand, stories like this one are realistic presentations of
emotions and feelings. My hope is that reasonable people can set aside their
biases, read this as the good story it is, and perhaps let the insights they
get from this story influence their thinking about the issues involved. Many
people will read this story to get some good ideas on how to seduce little
kids or will reject it out of hand because it is about something that is
immoral. Both groups will waste a perfectly good story.

This story raises a simple question: is it possible to write a story in which
an adult has sexual relations with a young adolescent in a way that would be
approved by reasonable, socially responsible people? I think this story (along
with several others, including Randu's "Double Trouble" and Santo Romeo's
"Martha Jane") demonstrate that the answer is yes. The related (and more
volatile) question is can this happen in real life? The answer certainly must
be yes, it CAN happen. The crucial question is DOES it happen? Or are all
adults who do this sexual perverts, as most laws seem to suggest?

As I have said earlier, literally all the young children whom I have known to
have experienced sex with an adult were severely exploited. It may not always
be accurate to call their partners perverts; "sick" or "dysfunctional" may be
better words for some of them. But - and this is an important BUT - kids who
have had perfectly adaptive - even wonderful - relationships like those
described in this story would have no incentive to come forth and talk to me
about it. In fact, if they did so, the adults whom they loved would possibly
suffer dire consequences. I seriously doubt that all adult-child sexual
relationships are as destructive as some child advocacy people would have us
believe; but I also think that most real-life adult-child sexual relationships
are exploitive.

I cannot conclude without mentioning one important issue. I think we need to
let kids be kids. In recent years movies and TV shows (especially the soaps)
have combined with peer pressure to urge kids to rush into adulthood way too
fast. An important part of the mother's logic in this story was that if Brenda
didn't have sexual relations with Richard, she'd be having sex with someone
else real soon. To the extent that her insight is accurate, her decision to
permit sex with Richard may be valid. But might it not be better to find a way
to encourage kids to grow up before they have sexual relations? As I
understand it, something like 25-40% of kids in the Western world don't have
sex until they are at least 18 years old. Granted, a bunch of these people
have major hang-ups; but statistically they're OK people. If I may use myself
as a case study, I think I really do all right sexually, even though I had a
full childhood before I began my active sex life; and I THINK the same can be
said of my daughters. Sexuality isn't the only area in which we tend to push
kids too fast; I constantly see parents trying to push preschoolers into
academic programs when they should be playing games or reading Little Red
Riding Hood. Ooops! {For an explanation of this Ooops, see the review of "The
Better To...." later in this issue.} Let's let kids be kids!

I like stories that raise thought-provoking questions in interesting contexts.
This story does exactly that.

Ratings for "Brenda's Conquest"
Athena (technical quality): 10
Venus (plot & character): 10
Celeste (appeal to reviewer): 10