Cherish Dept of Weights and Measures
"We Quantify the Qualities you enjoy."

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

TO: All Dept. Heads: Cherish Medical Group, Acquisitions Group, Office of the Mayor, and all other appropriate agencies
FROM: Ruckus, Chairman, Cherish Dept of Weights and Measures
SUBJECT: Appropriate Metrics for Use in Assessing the Female Bust
DATE: 30MAR05

Now as all cup/under bust, overall circumference and relative fruit size measurements are inherently flawed due to the subjective nature of the description.


Under bust/cup
For example a common measurement is a 42DD; this would indicate using the 5-6" subtraction rule common to most bras and that leaves you with a 36-37" actual under bust measurement. Supposing the classic female ideal of 36-24-36 this would leave exactly no breasts as cup size is the difference in inches between bust and under bust. Flaw 2 once we pass the standard DD mark we get into dangerous ground; this is a simple problem say the bimbo in question is a FF well how did we get there did we go DD,E,EE,F,FF or DD,DDD,E,F,FF or any number of other possibilities. Therefore this metric is invalid due to a non-standardized system.

Overall circumference
Due to the inherently unstable nature of the female breast (not something we gents are ready to give up) this is a flawed measurement. A woman with implants will have a decidedly different shape to her breasts the a all natural woman especially in the doggy style position. (Lindsey vs. Chelsea) These women may indeed have breast that weigh the same. Therefore; this too is a flawed metric.

Fruit Size
For those who need an explanation on the inherent flaws here:
1)stop reading now
2)cosult your local grocer (be sure to ask for six identical cantaloupes)

Alright now for a potential solution.
Bimbos stop reading now this part will make your already dizzy head hurt.
Non-science/math types read slowly and carefully physics and geometry will be discussed.

It has been decided a simple approach would be appropriate and one that has been mentioned by others in the community.

Individual Breast Diameter
As each breast when properly supported takes on a roughly spherical shape it is easy to determine diameter which leads to volume which leads to specific density which leads to mass (weight)

Implants generally force this shape and natural breasts can be enjoyably manhandled into it.
This Dept. won't concern itself with exactly how to acquire the diameter of each breast. (if interested the diameter of a sphere is equal to its circumference divided by (Pi*2))

Alright assuming we have the diameter we can determine volume and weight.
Using the formula for the volume of a sphere 4/3*Pi*r^3.
r=1/2 the diameter
We take the initial diameter (D) in inches we'll use 5" as an example (seems reasonable).
D/2=2.5"
2.5"*2.54cm=r in cm=6.35cm
6.35^3=256.047875cm^3 also called cc
256.047875*Pi*4/3=1072.5308307563702405303041134154cm^3
this value is the volume of each of the bimbos tits so 5" diameter is roughly a 1000cc implant.
The specific gravity(SG) of both water and silicone is 1 g/cm^3. (saline is actually denser hence the less natural movement.)
SG*1072.5308307563702405303041134154=1072.5308307563702405303041134154g
we will divide by 1000 to convert to kg
1.0725308307563702405303041134154kg
at 2.205 kg per lb each breast weighs in at
2.36lbs(rounded)

now the specific gravity of breast tissue and fat are different coming in at 1.2 and 0.95 respectively.
this make it such that in the same woman a silicone breast would weigh 2.36lbs
a pure breast tissue (actual milk producing cells) breast would weigh 2.84lbs
and a pure fat tissue breast would weigh 2.25lbs.

We hope this helps some people get a grasp of the weight of the situation and a good firm grip on the appropriate metrics to use when assessing a female's breasts.

Thank you,
Ruckus
Chairman
Cherish Dept of Weights and Measures
"We Quantify the Qualities you enjoy."
 

Enclosures(2)
Chart of diameter vs. weight
Graph of same.